In this unit (to accompany SAPIENS podcast S6E6), students go beyond the Mead–Freeman controversy to explore the repercussions of nature versus nurture in U.S. scholarly debates from the 1980s to the 2000s. Students will research how these debates trickled into mass media reporting and affected U.S. society.
Appell, George N. 1984. “Freeman’s Refutation of Mead’s Coming of Age in Samoa: The Implication for Anthropological Inquiry.” Eastern Anthropologist 37: 183–214.
Doughty, Howard. 2011. “Nature, Nurture, and Story-Telling: Part 1. The Freeman–Mead Controversy.” College Quarterly 14 (2).
Ortiz, Daniel. 1993. “Creating Controversy: Essentialism and Constructivism and the Politics of Gay Identity.” Virginia Law Review 79 (7): 1833–1857.
Pinker, Steven. 2004. “Why Nature and Nurture Won’t Go Away.” Daedalus 133 (4): 5–17.
Shankman, Paul. 2001. Margaret Mead. Berghahn, New York.
Article: Kaveh Majlesi, Paul J. Devereux, Petter Lundborg, and Sandra Black’s “The Role of Nature Versus Nurture in Wealth and Other Economic Outcomes and Behaviours”
Article: Leah McLaren’s “Does Parenting Even Matter?”
Article: Robin McKie’s “What Makes Us? Nature or Nurture? The DNA Debate Comes Back to Life”
Documentary: Tim Wardle’s Three Identical Strangers
Catherine Torres, Freedom Learning Group